Documents you need to buy or sell a business

featured-image

The documents you need to buy or sell a business depend on the structure (discussed here) and complexity of the deal as well as its specific terms. However, in virtually all cases, there will be a principal agreement governing the transaction. This will be a merger agreement for a merger, a stock purchase agreement for a stock purchase and, you guessed it, an asset purchase agreement for an asset purchase. These documents may have slightly different names at times. For example, a merger agreement may be called an agreement and plan of merger or a stock purchase agreement may be referred to as a securities purchase agreement or a purchase and sale agreement. Contracts for transactions involving the sale of stock and assets may simply be called purchase agreements.  By and large, these slight variances in nomenclature don’t reflect any substantive distinctions.

Below, I’ll describe the purpose of each of these principal transaction agreements. After that, I’ll also very briefly introduce you to several other common mergers and acquisitions (M&A) transaction documents, including:

  1. Confidentiality Agreements
  2. Letters of Intent
  3. Exclusivity Agreements
  4. Disclosure Schedules
  5. HSR Filings
  6. Third Party Consents
  7. Legal Opinions
  8. Stock Certificates
  9. Bills of Sale
  10. Assignment and Assumption Agreements
  11. Escrow Agreements and
  12. Transition Services Agreements.

There are dozens of other documents I could mention, including various Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings for public deals, other federal and state regulatory filings, board resolutions, proxy statements, closing certificates, non-competition agreements, shareholder representative agreements, financial adviser engagement letters, fairness opinions, exchange agent agreements, employment agreements, compensation plans, real estate documents, lien releases, financing documentation and more, but I’ll save those for later posts.  I’ll also spend more time discussing each of the following documents in subsequent posts.

Principal Transaction Agreements

Merger Agreements

Merger agreements provide that one company will merge with and into another company by operation of law, thereby effecting a change in control over one of the companies. They are the primary transaction agreement governing mergers and are frequently employed in public M&A deals. Among other things, these agreements typically:

  • address the cancellation of the target company’s shares and their conversion into the right to receive the purchase price from the buyer,
  • include mechanics for the tendering of cancelled shares and the payment of the purchase price to target company shareholders,
  • require the filing of one or more certificates of merger (or equivalent documents) with the state or states whose law governs the constituent companies,
  • provide for appraisal (dissenters’) rights,
  • contain representations and warranties from each party to the other as to its ability to consummate the transaction and, in the case of the target, its businesses,
  • contain covenants (i.e., binding promises) requiring the parties to make any necessary regulatory filings, obtain third party consents, secure permits, solicit shareholder approval and cooperate prior to and (except in public deals) after closing,
  • allow the parties to terminate the agreement under specified circumstances, such as the occurrence of an event that has a material adverse effect on the target company,
  • include conditions to closing and
  • in private M&A deals, provide for the parties to indemnify each other for losses resulting from breaches of the agreement.

In public transactions, merger agreements also contain deal protections (no-shops, break-up fees and other devices intended to make termination of the agreement less likely) and securities law compliance provisions. Want to buy a merger agreement?

Stock Purchase Agreements

Like merger agreements, stock purchase agreements, or SPAs, are the primary transaction documents governing a deal. However, SPAs take the place of merger agreements in stock purchase transactions where ownership of stock changes hands. No merger occurs. Among other things, SPAs typically:

  • provide for the transfer of stock, including, when applicable, physical delivery of stock certificates to the buyer, in return for payment of the purchase price, and
  • contain representations and warranties from each party to the other as to its ability to consummate the transaction and, in the case of the sellers, the target company’s businesses and the shares being transferred.

Otherwise, SPAs are very similar to merger agreements. Note, though, that they are almost never used in connection with an acquisition of 100% of a public company’s stock. Want to buy a stock purchase agreement?

Asset Purchase Agreements

Asset purchase agreements, or APAs, are the primary transaction documents governing sales of assets. However, rather than provide for a merger or transfer of shares, they establish the terms and conditions by which assets and liabilities will be conveyed by a seller to a buyer. APAs are very similar to stock purchase agreements, except for:

  • specific enumeration of the assets and liabilities being transferred,
  • providing for use of necessary legal instruments to transfer ownership, such as bills of sale (for personal property), assignment and assumption agreements (for contracts and permits), intellectual property assignments, real property transfer documents and so on,
  • some differences in representations and warranties of the seller, such as a representation that the acquired assets are sufficient to run the acquired business, and
  • provisions governing the treatment of assets that are used in both the business of the seller and the acquired business (shared assets).

Want to buy an asset purchase agreement?

Documents Signed Before Principal Transaction Agreements

Confidentiality Agreements

M&A confidentiality agreements are usually entered into at commencement of discussions between the parties to ensure the fact that discussions are occurring, the terms being discussed and information about the parties’ respective businesses will be maintained in confidence. I’ve written a lengthy post about confidentiality agreements in M&A deals here. Want to buy a confidentiality agreement?

Letters of Intent

Letters of intent, or LOIs, are short, largely non-binding documents signed by the parties to prospective M&A transactions that lay out the general framework for the transaction, including the target, the purchase price (or a purchase price range), transaction structure, contingencies (e.g., whether there’s a buyer financing contingency), covenants and the terms of any indemnification.

Although LOIs are intended to be non-binding, they are employed by M&A parties as a tool to simplify the negotiation process by crystallizing the most material issues early in their interaction. By investing a bit of extra effort in hammering out an LOI at the commencement of discussions, parties can reduce the risk that they will needlessly expend even more resources through a full-scale due diligence, negotiation and definitive document drafting process only to discover that there is no deal to be had.

Read more about letters of intent here.

Exclusivity Agreements

Exclusivity agreements are very short (1-2 page) agreements through which a seller agrees not to begin or continue attempting to sell the target company to a third party for a period of time (typically, 15-60 days). They are generally sought by buyers who do not wish to compete or continue competing with third parties for a deal. As one might expect, sellers agree to exclusivity reluctantly, as doing so may reduce their ability to maximize value from the transaction by inducing competing bids. However, without exclusivity, many buyers will refuse to invest the time and resources in conducting fulsome due diligence and negotiating an LOI or definitive transaction agreements. Want to buy an exclusivity agreement?

Documents Effective Upon Signing Principal Transaction Agreement

Disclosure Schedules

Disclosure schedules, sometimes called disclosure letters, aren’t separate agreements or other independently operative instruments. Rather, they are attachments to, and made a part of, the deal’s principal transaction agreement (merger agreement, SPA or APA). Their primary purpose is to provide disclosure about one of the parties to the transaction and to qualify or limit representations and warranties, and they are frequently quite lengthy, sometimes even exceeding 100 pages.

A given deal may have two disclosure schedules, one for the buyer and one for the seller or target. However, a seller or target disclosure schedule is far more common than one for the buyer. Buyer disclosure schedules are usually only needed in deals where the seller requires a significant amount of information about the buyer, such as, for example, when the purchase price is paid with buyer stock.

The disclosure provided by disclosure schedules is usually tied to specific representations and warranties contained in the principal transaction agreement. For example, a representation relating to material contracts of the target company may include a reference to a list of such contracts in the seller disclosure schedule. Alternatively, the information contained in the disclosure schedule may qualify or limit the scope of corresponding representations and warranties. For example, a representation may provide that there are no existing legal proceedings involving the target, except as set forth in the seller disclosure schedule.

Documents Needed Between Signing and Closing

HSR Filings

The Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 requires parties to M&A transactions that meet certain criteria to file a Premerger Notification and Report Form, commonly called an HSR filing, with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) before they may consummate the transaction. These filings are designed to provide information to the FTC and U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) for the purpose of determining whether the proposed transaction may have an anti-competitive effect on any relevant markets. If the FTC and DOJ have no concerns, then the parties may close the transaction 30 days after making the HSR filing (or earlier of the authorities grant early termination of the waiting period).

Third Party Consents

Many target companies are subject to agreements with third parties that restrict their ability to consummate a deal. These may include leases, loan agreements, customer contracts and more. Whether they may impede the transaction depends on the specific terms of the agreement, the law governing the agreement and the structure of the transaction.  For example, while a direct assignment of a contract may be prohibited, which would interfere with an asset sale transaction, a merger or change in control (i.e., a sale of stock) of the target may not be so restricted.

When contractual restrictions cannot be avoided through creative deal structuring, M&A parties must obtain written consents from third parties who have rights that would be triggered by a deal. These consents are simple instruments that must be tailored to the specific terms of the subject agreement, and they are rarely controversial in form. However, securing the required consents may at times prove difficult and time-consuming, as some counterparties may use their leverage to extract value from the requesting party.

Documents Delivered At or Effective After Closing

Legal Opinions

Occasionally, a seller’s attorneys may be called upon to render a written legal opinion for the buyer to be delivered at closing. These opinions are intended to provide additional assurance to the buyer that certain legal matters are as they have been described by the seller in its representations and warranties. A typical opinion might cover the following matters:

  • the target was duly formed,
  • the target is in good standing in relevant states,
  • the target’s capital structure (i.e., shares outstanding),
  • the transaction and transaction agreements will not violate the target’s charter and other organizational documents or material contracts,
  • there is no litigation pending or threatened against the target and
  • any issuance of stock or other securities in the transaction complies with federal and state securities laws.

While commonplace in the past, buyers only rarely request seller legal opinions today on account of the legal fees that must be incurred to obtain them as well as the buyer’s ability to confirm independently many or all of the matters that would be addressed by the opinion.

Stock Certificates

Stock certificates are the physical embodiment of an ownership interest in a corporation. If the target is a limited liability company or partnership, equivalent membership, unit or partnership certificates may exist. These must be signed by the seller or sellers and delivered to the buyer at closing of a stock purchase transaction. In merger transactions, they are deemed cancelled and converted into the right to receive the merger consideration upon delivery to the buyer or paying agent.

Bills of Sale

Bills of sale are short instruments that actually transfer ownership of personal property from the seller to the buyer. They are only used in asset purchase transactions because personal property transfers to the buyer automatically in a stock purchase or merger. They are typically attached as exhibits to APAs, and the seller agrees to deliver a duly executed bill of sale to the buyer at closing.

In very simple asset sales, parties may forego an APA and instead prepare a long-form bill of sale that includes basic representations and warranties and, possibly, covenants. Want to buy a bill of sale?

Assignment and Assumption Agreements

Assignment and assumption agreements are analogous to bills of sale, except they effect the transfer of contracts, permits and similar assets by the seller to the buyer in an asset purchase transaction. It’s important to note that the word “assumption” in the title of these instruments refers to the buyer’s assumption of liabilities associated with the assigned assets.

As with bills of sale, it is possible, though uncommon, for parties to simple M&A transactions to rely solely on a long-form assignment and assumption agreement containing representations and warranties rather than a full APA. Want to buy an assignment and assumption agreement?

Escrow Agreements

In private M&A transactions, sellers usually agree to indemnify (i.e., hold harmless and protect) buyers and their affiliates and representatives from any losses they incur as a result of breaches of the seller’s representations, warranties and covenants contained in the principal transaction agreement. Should such an indemnification obligation arise post-closing, the buyer or other indemnified party would become an unsecured creditor of the seller or sellers, and it may be difficult for the indemnified party to collect on this debt.

To mitigate this risk, buyers frequently demand, and sellers usually agree, that a portion of the purchase price will be deposited with a trustworthy third party agent to hold for a period of time after closing for the purpose of remitting funds to indemnified parties if they become entitled to recover damages from the seller or sellers. These escrow arrangements are governed by escrow agreements signed by the parties to the M&A transaction as well as the third party escrow agent. Aside from establishing the mechanics for distributing the funds, escrow agreements also set forth the terms of the escrow agent’s engagement, including its rights, obligations and fees. Want to buy an escrow agreement?

Transition Services Agreements

Many M&A transactions involve the sale of only part of the operations of a larger enterprise. Thus, the extraction of the target business may be disruptive to that business, as it loses enterprise-wide services and support it had previously enjoyed. This may include, among other things, the loss of IT and telecommunications services, finance and accounting services, participation in employee benefits plans, legal and compliance support, equipment maintenance, logistics support, supply chain management and access to favorable vendor pricing and other terms.

To ameliorate the challenges of transitioning an acquired business to new ownership, necessary support may be provided by the seller to the target company and buyer for an agreed-upon period of time post-closing. Such arrangements are commonly reflected in a transition services agreement, which identifies the subject services, allows for adding or modifying services at the request of the target or buyer, establishes a standard for performance by the seller, sets fees for the services (which are usually, but not always, at below-market rates), allocates potential liability arising from the provision of services and provides for a term for each service to be provided. Want to buy a transition services agreement?

*               *               *

Erik Lopez is the M&A lawyer responsible for this blog. Feel free to contact Erik at erik@jassolopez.com or +1-214-601-1887.

erik

Erik Lopez

Partner at Jasso Lopez PLLC

Erik is an M&A lawyer with over 23 years of domestic and cross-border, public and private M&A experience. He has successfully closed hundreds of deals totaling tens of billions of dollars in value for a global client-base. He is a graduate of the University of Chicago and New York University School of Law. You can reach Erik at erik@jassolopez.com.